Constitutional review in the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Republic of Turkey: prospects for the development of the activities of the Constitutional Courts of Kazakhstan and Turkey, impact on the protection of human rights

Abstract

This article provides a comparative legal analysis of the activities of the Constitutional Courts of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Republic of Turkey and begins with a brief overview of the institutional features of the courts. The analysis allows us to assess how effectively the constitutional courts function in each country and what mechanisms ensure the protection of human rights. The main objective of the study is to assess the structure, competence, decision-making procedures and the impact on the protection of human rights in the context of the legal systems of both countries.

The research methodology includes an analysis of regulatory legal acts, decisions and regulatory rulings of constitutional courts, as well as a comparative analysis of legislation and the practice of applying laws in both countries.

The results of the analysis allow us to draw conclusions about the similarities and differences in the activities of the constitutional courts of the two countries, as well as to assess their effectiveness in ensuring the protection of human and civil rights and freedoms. Based on the analysis, recommendations were formulated to improve the current legislation in the field of regulating the activities of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Ultimately, the study aims to provide a deeper understanding and assessment of the legal significance of constitutional courts both individually and in comparison between the two countries, taking into account their role in ensuring legal protection and guaranteeing the fundamental rights and freedoms of man and citizen.